EasiHeat Packaged Heat Exchanger System
A configurable packaged steam-to-water heat exchanger system for approximately 70 kW to 3.45 MW duties, with steam, condensate or dual control options.
How to choose the right heat transfer route
Heat transfer projects usually become clearer when you separate indirect heating duties from energy-recovery duties. The main decision is whether the site needs to deliver controlled heat into a secondary circuit, recover flash steam that is already being wasted, or link both actions into a broader condensate and efficiency project.
| Route | Best fit when | Main objective | Next route |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steam heat exchangers | Steam must transfer heat safely into a secondary water circuit for hot water or process duty | Controlled indirect heating with packaged equipment | Browse heat exchangers |
| Thermocompressors | Flash steam is available and can be reused inside the process | Recover otherwise wasted thermal energy | Browse thermocompressors |
| Condensate and heat recovery systems | The project also depends on returning hot condensate or managing wider recovery around the steam loop | Extend heat recovery beyond a single packaged device | Explore recovery systems |
Typical routes from common heat-transfer searches
Heat-transfer searches usually separate into indirect heating versus energy recovery. Start with steam heat exchangers when the project is about delivering controlled heat into a secondary water circuit. Use thermocompressors when flash steam is already available and the main goal is to reuse that energy inside the process.
If the project extends beyond a single packaged unit and also depends on returned hot condensate or wider loop recovery, continue into condensate recovery systems. Where the improvement case is primarily energy-led, this route also works naturally alongside broader steam flowmeters and recovery planning.